A learning analytics dashboard with opinions.
Most analytics dashboards are a metrics buffet: forty tiles, no argument. Ours is opinionated — every screen is built around a decision someone has to make: who needs help this week, which content is failing, what do I tell the board?
The manager’s Monday screen
A team lead gets one screen: the cohort split into healthy, needs-attention and at-risk — with names, causes and a recommended action per flag. Falling adherence reads differently from decaying accuracy, and the recommended response differs too. The screen’s job is to turn five minutes on Monday into the right two conversations.
Executives get the opposite altitude: retention trend by function, program value against spend, and risk concentration — the three charts a quarterly review actually uses, exportable as a one-page board pack.
Retention, drawn honestly
Cohort curves show measured retention with the projection-without-practice as the counterfactual — so the value of the program is visible as the gap between two lines, not asserted in a caption.
Mastery with depth
Every skill splits by Bloom level: a team can recall the procedure yet fail to apply it — that difference is two different trainings, and the dashboard keeps them separate.
Calibration — the hidden metric
Confidence versus accuracy per learner and team. Overconfident-and-wrong is the most dangerous quadrant in any risk-bearing role, and almost no analytics product measures it. This one leads with it.
The dashboard itself
Cohort retention, at-risk list, mastery by level — the four tiles an L&D lead checks before the Monday stand-up.
Interface shown as an illustration with representative numbers, not a screenshot — the layout is the product’s.
Walk the three screens with your data.
A 30-minute session: manager view, exec view, content view — populated from a sample of your training history.
Questions buyers ask
Can we build custom views?
The built-in screens cover the manager / executive / content-owner decisions, and the same aggregates export by API to your BI stack for anything bespoke. Most teams find the opinionated screens are the ones that get used.
Who can see individual learner data?
Scope follows the org structure: managers see their own teams, site leads their sites, and platform admins configure visibility policy. Every access is logged.
How real-time is the data?
Practice results land in dashboards within minutes. Trend aggregates and forecasts refresh on a schedule appropriate to their cadence — a retention trend doesn’t change by the hour, and pretending it does is noise.
What’s the “content view” for?
Item quality: which questions underperform, which concepts generate the most confusion, where the bank is thin. It’s how the question bank improves instead of silently rotting.
Can flags trigger actions automatically?
Flags can notify managers and enqueue recommended practice automatically; anything heavier-handed stays a human decision by design.
See it on your own content.
Bring one course. We’ll show you the retention curve your current training leaves behind — and what scheduled review does to it.
- 30 minutes, on your calendar — pick a slot here
- Run on your own content wherever possible, not a canned deck
- You see the dashboards, the learner surface and the evidence exports
- No commitment — and pilot data stays yours either way