You instrument every control except the human one.
Your stack telemeters everything — endpoints, identities, network flows — and then the human layer, the vector in most breach reports, gets an annual module and a phishing-sim click rate. This platform instruments it properly: recognition measured, maintained, and mapped like any other control.
A control you neither monitor nor maintain isn’t a control
Apply your own standards to awareness training: a control deployed annually, unmonitored between deployments, with effectiveness measured by a satisfaction survey — it wouldn’t survive one architecture review. Yet that’s the human layer’s standard posture, while the attack traffic against it runs continuous and adaptive. The click-rate chart after each annual campaign documents the decay; nobody treats it as the monitoring gap it is.
Instrumented awareness runs like the rest of the stack: weekly micro-drills as the maintenance cadence; recognition telemetry per team and threat pattern; calibration analysis locating the confidently-wrong before attackers do; and decay flags triggering reinforcement the way drift triggers redeployment. The human layer becomes a monitored control with a dashboard — which is what it always should have been.
Drills tuned to your threat picture
Your incident patterns and current campaign lures become scenario material — awareness that tracks your actual adversaries, not a generic library’s greatest hits.
Telemetry your SOC vocabulary recognises
Recognition rates by team and pattern, decay trends, high-risk cohorts — exportable to the same dashboards the rest of your controls report into.
Simulation programs, completed
Phishing sims test occasionally; drills maintain between tests — click rates become the lagging confirmation of what recognition telemetry already showed.
The human layer, hardened
Phish-spot rates, policy recall and the risky-role heatmap — security awareness as a measured control, not a checkbox.
Interface shown as an illustration with representative numbers, not a screenshot — the layout is the product’s.
Measure your awareness half-life.
One team, one month of drills — the decay curve from your own workforce makes the instrumentation case internally.
The evidence this page stands on
Questions buyers ask
Does this replace our phishing simulation tool?
Complements: sims are your penetration tests, drills are your patching cadence. Teams running both watch sim results improve as drill telemetry predicts.
What’s the platform’s own security posture?
SSO via your IdP, role-scoped access, logging throughout, EU hosting — the security page documents it, and your review process is welcome.
How does this feed our ISO/SOC evidence needs?
Continuously — per-person verified awareness with maintenance history exports in audit shape, upgrading the annual-deck exhibit those frameworks usually see.
Will employees tolerate weekly security drills?
Minutes weekly beats the annual hour on every satisfaction measure we’ve seen — and framing recognition as a skill respects people more than compliance theatre does.
See it on your own content.
Bring one course. We’ll show you the retention curve your current training leaves behind — and what scheduled review does to it.
- 30 minutes, on your calendar — pick a slot here
- Run on your own content wherever possible, not a canned deck
- You see the dashboards, the learner surface and the evidence exports
- No commitment — and pilot data stays yours either way